C-Suite vs. Employees

mind the gap.png

Here’s a little research that caught my eye.

It may not seem relevant, but stick with me….. It matters.

83% of C-level or president-level executives say curiosity is encouraged “a great deal” or “a good amount” at their company. Just 52% of individual contributors say the same.

While about half (49%) of the C-level believes curiosity is rewarded by salary growth, only 16% of individual contributors agree. A staggering 81% of individual contributors are convinced curiosity makes no material difference in their compensation.
— Spencer Harrison, Erin Pinkus and Jon Cohen

This research is about curiosity.  I think you could substitute innovation, creativity, problem-solving, initiative and more.  And you’d get similar results.

That means:

  • When you’d like your team to be more innovative, have encouraged that, but see no improved results - check for a gap.

  • When you’ve been encouraging leaders across the organization to show more initiative without seeing any changes - check for a gap.

  • When you’ve invested in training teams to work together more effectively…… with no demonstrable change - check for a gap.

And how to check the gap?  An informal discussion in a team meeting. A short survey.  Keep it simple.

If this resonates for you, check out the first half of the article.

This is a skill set you won’t read or hear much about. But to me - it’s a winner.  A competitive advantage. I mean - how many leaders do you know that do this? Who make it a habit?   

I don’t know the name of it - or if it has one, so I’ll call it “Mind the Gap.”

Wrapping up:

Leaders who mind the gap - between their perceptions and the experience of the people on their teams and across the organization…… Those are leaders who go beyond good intentions. They’re the leaders with a head start on creating real change.